India And China Development Driven By Internal Efforts
  • The statement from Chinese Ambassador Xu Feihong states that both India and China developed through their continuous dedication toward work. The foreign assistance that he received from other nations did not help him attain his current level of achievement.
  • He made these remarks while referring indirectly to comments by Christopher Landau. Landau had earlier indicated that past policy decisions related to China would not be repeated in the case of India.

Remarks at India-China Youth Dialogue

  • Xu Feihong spoke during a youth dialogue program involving participants from India and China. The event he participated in showed his knowledge about the economic and social development that both nations achieved.
  • The process of development in both countries happens through Responding to his explanation citizens of both countries acted as the main drivers who brought about development while international organizations brought no assistance to support their advancement.
  • He stressed that national effort remains the primary reason behind recent achievements.

Call for Strong Bilateral Relations

Xu Feihong encouraged both countries to strengthen their cooperation while maintaining their diplomatic stability. He stated that India and China should continue as neighboring countries that support each other’s growth.

His statement main points include

  • The ambassador wants to maintain good ties between the two nations while he deals with his current mission.
  • The ambassador wants to establish a relationship between two countries that will last for many years.
  • The two nations need to trust each other to work together as friends who will create peace and mutual prosperity.

Concerns About External Influence

The ambassador raised a warning about how outside elements impact the relationship between his country and its counterpart from another nation. He suggested that some groups or entities may try to create differences between India and China.

He stated that:

  • Certain parties may not support closer ties
  • These groups may attempt to increase tensions
  • They will act according to their personal motivations

However, he did not name or identify these parties.